Religious Symbolism in A Lesson Before Dying
As
we near the end of A Lesson Before Dying,
the religious symbolism has become more and more clear to me. It’s something
that we’ve only brushed up against in class but is something that I think is
pretty prominent in the book. There’s the obvious religious influence of
Reverend Ambrose and the importance that religion has in the community. While Grant
does not partake in religion, he makes it clear to the reader the role it plays
to the adults in the community. Miss Emma brings in the minister to talk to
Jefferson as well as Grant because she does worry about Jefferson. Jefferson’s
reaction to Reverend Ambrose is a little bit harder to determine though.
Perhaps he is less responsive to the reverend simply because he is not able to
relate and connect to him the way that Grant eventually is able to. Yet what I
am more interested in is the symbol of Jefferson in the same position as Jesus.
It
was briefly mentioned in discussion that Jefferson could stand in as Jesus figure as his death is a sacrifice for
the black community, as a way of symbolizing the break in the cycle that Grant
hopes for him to achieve. The timing of the events especially adds to this
parallel. Grant makes a point to clearly discuss how the date of Jefferson’s
execution was specifically chosen based on the timing of Lent and Easter. Not
only does this continue to show example of the importance of religion within
the community, but also attaches the idea of Jesus’ sacrifice to Jefferson’s
death. One scene that particularly stood out to me was Jefferson’s speech about
how he was being asked to carry everyone’s crosses but no one has ever carried
his own, “Me to take the cross. Your cross, nannan’s cross, my own cross” (224).
Of course the metaphor of the cross to bear has become more common place and
secular in recent years but it has an inherent religious meaning. Add all of
his mentions of carrying the cross to the fact that Grant mentions that that
day is Good Friday, the day Jesus died, and the fact that exactly two weeks
from that, Jefferson will also die. There is also something to be said about
the apparent innocence in both of these figures.
However,
another connection that I made was that, if Jefferson is Jesus, does that make
Paul Pontius Pilate? We’ve discussed the fact that despite his efforts not to,
Paul has become attached to Jefferson and doesn’t want to have to see him die.
Yet because of his job, Paul will have to take part in Jefferson’s execution. This
is similar to Pilate’s role as a judge in the crucifixion of Jesus. He attempts
to stand up for Jesus, pointing out to the crowd that there is little evidence
for anything that Jesus has done wrong, yet the crowd insists that Jesus is the
one to deserve the punishment, and he is forced to go through with it to please
the crowd. In this case, I look at the white citizens as the crowd calling for
Jesus’ death. Paul is pressured into compliance the same way that Pilate is.
I really like the comparison you make between Paul and Pontius Pilate. Now, I don't know a lot about Jesus's death, and my knowledge of Pilate comes entirely from Jesus Christ Superstar. But I think you've got a point. I think Paul stands up for Jefferson a little bit less than Pilate did for Jesus, but that's more of due to Paul not being the judge in this situation than his morals. But I agree that Paul is forced into a situation he believes is wrong much like Pilate.
ReplyDeleteThere was also a brief mention of Paul being like Paul from the Bible, who spreads Jesus's word. This also has some truth to it, as Paul is the one to deliver Jefferson's notebook to Grant. However, I think your idea of Paul as Pilate makes more sense, as he's stuck in a position he doesn't like where's he's supposed to side with (and is generally closer with) the enemy. He's not part of the victim's side here, he started on the side of the enemy. And while he does deliver the notebook, he's more of the delivery boy than the messenger.
Pilate famously "washes his hands" of responsibility for Jesus's execution. With Paul, at the very end of the novel, I think we see quite the opposite--a kind of taking of some responsibility for his role, or the role of the institution he represents, in Jefferson's conviction and death sentence. He ends up getting much "closer" to Jefferson than Pilate to Jesus, and it's he who is able to :"testify" to the fact that not only did Jefferson walk, but "he was the strongest man in that room." He delivers Jefferson's words to Grant, and makes an offer of friendship. If Jefferson's death takes on meaning based on how it transforms others who hear about it, Paul would seem to be our best measure of the success of that meaning.
ReplyDelete